Wednesday, May 9, 2012

The Avengers

Where to begin on this one?... Hmmm alot happening surrounding this movie, and maybe even more that occurs during it. It's so difficult to do a movie like this justice in a review, because it means such different things to the people that will see it. Take me for instance, I wouldn't consider myself a comic book nerd by any stretch of the imagination, but as a kid I probably browsed a couple of those Marvel comic books and I of course knew who all those superheroes were/are. Don't ask me where Hawkeye originated from or what Captain America's shield is constructed of because I won't be able to tell you. I think that stuff are important elements of the story, but alas I don't allocate too much of daily life to remembrance of fictional superhero character etymology, it's mostly spent immersed in more tangible things like working to pay the bills, socializing with friends, eating meals, etc. That's sort of a jab at fan-boy comic book geeks who don't seem to grow up, the ones that you satirized in television and other films. Think Jeff Albertson or Comic Book Guy, from the Simpsons. Anyways, I think it's worth mentioning them because they never seem satisfied by a "major" motion picture effort like this one, bringing it down with commentary like, "Hated Iron Man's Mark VII suit, it didn't incorporate the arc reactor enough into the total design". Major in parentheses because of the $220 million budget of this film, apparently another couple million dollars would've been necessary to achieve that perfect Iron Man suit luster, I'm sure. But, truthfully a movie of, The Avenger's, proportions attracts such a diverse audience that it is almost impossible to review it in a way that is relevant universally, but nevertheless I'll try.

It goes without saying that this movie has an exceptional cast, but I obviously just said it, so let me touch on a few performances that sort of sealed the deal. Robert Downey Jr., as Tony Stark, was probably the most memorably and I attribute this to a couple reasons. One being that he's gotten the most practice playing the role of the billionaire playboy/philanthropist/inventor in the two Iron Man movies, the other being the script. In this movie, his role is very well written, heavy on quips and retort, especially with Chris Evans character, Captain America. Samuel L. Jackson's character, Nick Fury, also had a larger role in this film, which went over well with me. His emergence as a more conflicted, secretive S.H.I.E.L.D director was portrayed well by the accomplished actor.

Joss Whedon, the movie's director, deserves a ton of credit for just how good the movie was. You may remember him from The Buffy the Vampire Slayer television series, Angel, or as the writer of the original Toy Story. As the film's director he does an uncanny job of introducing the superheroes to us and then letting them interact together on-screen in a way that's obviously out of this world and very down to earth (If that makes any sense). Even more credit to his writing prowess, as the script stood out to me as an above average achievement for a blockbuster of this scope. Stan Lee, the venerable "Godfather" of all Marvel Comics, is made out to be a genius in the way that he's assembled "The Avengers" through the development of Robert Downey Jr., Chris Evans', and Chris Hemsworth's characters in Thor, Captain America, and both Iron Man installments.

Quite simply, The Avenger's is way better than the Hunger Games, can be enjoyed by females (Just ask my roommate) it will outshine any effort that Spielberg and Co. can muster for Men in Black 3, so it should be a must see for all moviegoers for the month of May.